"ORIGIN OF THE FAMILY AND NAME OF KINGSLEY "Tradition says that "as William II of England or William Rufus (the Red King) was one day hunting in the New Forest,
he became separated from his companions and attendants, and wandering aimlessly about through forest and glade, be- came hopelessly lost. But just as night was closing in with its darkness and gloom, he espied a friendly light gleaming from the cabin of one of the yeomen who lived on the confines of the forest. Hastening thither, he begged shelter for the night, without making his identity known. He was kindly received and hospitably entertained so far as the means at hand in the humble abode would allow. The man of the house at once slaughtered a young goat from which, with other means at hand, his good wife prepared a savory re- past, whose delightful odors reached the nostrils of the hungry King and whose delectable flavors greatly pleased his palate. "The King of course being weary from the arduous sports of the day, the humble couch provided him brought most refreshing slumbers, from which he awoke to partake of another bounteous repast, which the wife had prepared such as her female descendants have ever since been noted for preparing). "In going abroad by the light of day he discovered that he was in his own meadow or 'Lea' as it was anciently called in England. "He was so delighted with the hospitality he had received that he bestowed the whole of that portion of his domain known as the King's Lea upon his host and made him a Baron. The recipient took the name of the land bestowed upon him, Kyngesleigh (or Kingsley), and the family crest or coat of arms contains the King's crown surmounted by a goat's head."Source: Brown, Leroy. Kingsley Geneology 1907: title page and pg. 5.
I have found several problems with the information in this account.
1. King William II of England died in 1100. The land and title was granted to Ranulph in 1123. (Ormerod p. 43)
2. Randle, Third Earl of Chester is the one who owned the land. He bestowed it and the title of Master Forester on Ranulph. It was not bestowed by a king. (Ormerod p. 43; Harrison p. 6)
3. It is suggested in the poem that Ranulph is an English peasant. The name 'Ranulph' appears to be Norman. (Ormerod p. 43)
4. It's inconceivable that a king or a noble would be able to hide his identity, as his garments, no matter how dirty they become would be markedly different than those of peasants.
5. No mention in historical records shows that Ranulph was made a Baron.
6. Ranulph is named as 'Ranulph de Kingsley' in this account and the historical documents. Most likely, Ranulph was called such because he was Norman and he was 'of the town of Kingsley. The French phrase use 'de' as we use 'of.' So it is more likely that his name shows his home rather than that he took the name because of the event of being given the land of Kingsley. In fact, documents describing the event call him 'de Kingsley' before he is given the land. (Ormerod, p. 55)
7. Several other accounts show a different coat of arms, with the main symbol being a black horn. This horn was passed down several generations and 'carried the family through troubles to this day.' (Kingsley p. 241.)
Somehow Ranulph gained the favor of Randle to the tune of a respectable title and land. Was Ranulph a peasant? Did he find Randle or King Henry 1st wandering lost in the forest of Mara or Mordrem, feed him, rest him and lead him to safety? As much as I'd like to believe it as written, the flaws are pretty hard to ignore.
Sources:
Domesday Book 1086:n. pag. web. Entries under 'Kingsley' and 'Chester.'
Harrison, William. "Ancient Forests, Chases and Deer Parks in Cheshire." Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Liverpool. Proceedings and Papers. 20:1-28. Print.
Kingsley, Charles. Charles Kingsley: His letters and memories of his life Vol. II. 1894: New York. Web. p. 241.
Ormerod, George. The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester. London. 1819: 3, 43, 50, 55. print.
It is possible that you and my wife have a common ancestor. Is your tree available somewhere?
ReplyDelete